Reflections on Quaker Revival


The Icon of the Descent of the Holy Spirit on the Apostles– 6th century,

I’m currently in Pisac, Peru for the Friends World Committee’s World Plenary Meeting. There are Friends from all over the world and from every Quaker Tradition—Evangelical, Liberal, Holiness, and Conservative—worshipping and enjoying fellowship together. The sight of these mutually affirming interactions between Friends has been profoundly touching, and I would be lying if I said I wasn’t overwhelmed. I am overwhelmed, in a glorious, beautiful way, but in a way that is still exhausting and feels like a burden. I am seeing the gifts that every branch has to offer, and have met so many Friends who truly care about the well-being of the whole Society of Friends, and I am finding some hope to believe that renewal, and perhaps even revival, is possible in this strange Religious Society I’ve stumbled into. But part of me feels the weight of the challenge of renewal.

My head is flooded with questions, concerns, and doubts.

What will it take to usher in renewal into the Society of Friends? What does a revival that includes both Christian and non-Christian Friends look like? Is it possible? Does a Quaker revival have to include institutional Quakerism? Part of me would love to be done with institutional Quakerism and carry my Quaker convictions elsewhere, perhaps in a more organic Christian community.

I feel the weight of old wineskins, the static ritualism and unspoken etiquette, clogging up our meetings. I feel the individualism flaunted in Liberal Quakerism blocking us from truly becoming an inclusive community. I am haunted by the lack of spiritual identity and a focused vision in Liberal Quakerism. I know in my heart that Proverbs 29:18 is true: where there is no vision, the people perish. I see it happening right before my eyes.

And programmed, pastoral Quakerism has me equally concerned. How are these dividing yearly meetings reflecting the reality of Pentecost and the reconciling work of Christ? What will it take for Evangelical Friends to affirm, support, and bless their LGBT+ sisters and brothers? What makes progressive Evangelical Friends distinct from other liberal Protestant churches, and even Liberal Quakerism?

And I wonder, what authority do I have to raise these questions, let alone critique this established tradition and try to offer solutions?

Maybe those issues shouldn’t concern me. Maybe this is all in fact a good thing and I don’t doubt that I am unable to see all that God is up to. And as a person without theological training, and even without a degree, I often doubt that I have a role in this conversation, let alone the fact that I’m a newcomer to the Society.

Somehow, though, I feel a loyalty and commitment to this Body. I don’t know how it happened exactly, especially since I am so often unable to connect and relate to Liberal Quaker culture (and I am an attender of a Liberal meeting) and to be frank, I don’t feel welcome in any branch of Quakerism. But my personality and faith tend to be quite communal, and I cannot help but feel gratitude to the Quaker Saints of the past who lived shameless, prophetic, and radical lifestyles and built up a community that knew the love and power of God. I cannot help but sense that I was led here to inherit the gifts, graces, and mantle of these saints, and continue their laboring for the gospel. I am blown away by the good news they preached and lived, and I personally feel led to honor them by being active in the Society they met Christ in.

And I know living saints today who continue to preach this gospel and reveal Christ in a way that expands on the revelations and work of earlier Friends. I want to walk beside these Friends and encourage them in the Way of Peace and the Gospel of the Kingdom.

More than anything, I would hate to see the potential gifts that Quakerism has to offer both the Christian and the spiritual seeker go unrealized.

The interdependent spiritual community, centered not on dogma but the dynamic experience of the Spirit of Love, is something I see many seeking but unable to find. We can be a community that offers a healthy, communal mysticism, not for our own “edification,” but so that we can be launched into the world to extend this love at all costs. Believe me, once you experience the love of God, you can’t keep it to yourself. We were meant to be a community of radical prophets. And people want this.

Yet so often Quaker legalism and what is perceived as a lack of Spirit in our tribe keeps these seekers from finding the treasures of Quakerism. We have other issues, too, of course, like the overwhelming whiteness in American Quakerism. But I believe that more than clever marketing, and more than new programs, the root of our issue is that we need the Spirit of God to be able to reach the people that want what we offer.

We need to be willing to be shaken by the Spirit in order to be revived.  We need the fire of the Spirit to refine us in order to fully embrace what God has in store for us. We need to be willing to be transformed, even if it means giving up our traditions and sacrificing our sacred cows. We need to be humbled so that God can do what God wants to do. We desperately need the Holy Spirit in order to creatively usher in this all-consuming revival. And if we don’t yield to the Spirit, we will perish.

Who am I to say these things? What authority do I have? None really. But I can assure you that I say this because I care about Friends, and I care about those seeking an authentic spirituality and community, and I care about the burnt out Christians looking for a purer gospel. In the world, I suppose I have little authority, but I hope that me being a child of God will be enough reason for Friends to hear me out and join me in prayer.

12 thoughts on “Reflections on Quaker Revival

  1. God seems to have placed you in this spot in the center of Quakerism right now. That’s how I would deal with the “who am I… questions. It’s not necessary for you to understand it all. Let the Spirit work through you. God will use you. Don’t worry much about whether Quakerism is your long-term home or not. Just let it happen.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This is a beautiful statement, Hye Sung; Thank you! I think you’ve captured something about that something in this little Society that still speaks to some of us somehow. It sounds so tenuous, doesn’t it? But if God seems to have some kind of fondness for working with broken vessels, as the Scriptures appear to repeatedly imply, then there be openings for Friends yet! Sometimes it seems the Religious Society of Friends is a lot like the Roman Catholic Church, only with a lot less glitter and an only slightly lower self-opinion of itself, that despite our stumbling and our stammering, the Holy Spirit just keeps coming in somehow! Amazing!


  3. Mary G says:

    As a Christian who knows of the Friends but is not part of “the “tribe” your words speak very powerfully to me. So many of us, from so many traditions are struggling with these same thoughts. So far there seem few answers but the asking is so important. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Yes! I pray about this, not that it be an actual broadcasting of what Quakerism is but that we can be IN ACTION and let our lives speak as Jesus Christ’s did:
    “The interdependent spiritual community, centered not on dogma but the dynamic experience of the Spirit of Love, is something I see many seeking but unable to find. We can be a community that offers a healthy, communal mysticism, not for our own “edification,” but so that we can be launched into the world to extend this love at all costs. Believe me, once you experience the love of God, you can’t keep it to yourself. We were meant to be a community of radical prophets. And people want this.”

    Thank you for speaking up.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Paul Klinkman says:

    I try to separate our initial search for spiritual experience, which often leads in time to work and sacrifice for our communities, from the issues of church overhead. Lots of people still hunger for agape but then something unrelated happens at church.

    I’m usually sad when I hear about religious fighting and splits. The early Christians squabbled with the mainstream Jews and it’s been downhill ever since.

    I’ve heard of at least one modern unprogrammed meeting’s fission over a rather minor protocol issue, and I note the big Wilburite and Hicksite splits in the 19th century, but in general I see business meetings using consensus process as holding their own versus Robert’s Rules of Order meetings.

    Money can be a common fighting issue. Usually the church or meeting spends beyond its means and then yells, “The Lord will provide the mammon.” Unfortunately, worshiping the Lord and mammon simultaneously isn’t going to turn out well. So the meeting spends more and more of its spare energy raising mammon. This is also a warning about hiring hireling ministers. I know of a synagogue that paid its rabbi an extraordinary amount per year, but the synagogue didn’t have the income so they burned through their considerable reserves and finally went into receivership.

    Anger is a human emotion. It’s also an issue to be partially solved. Traci Hjelt-Sullivan at FGC appointed a go-to psychotherapist. I remember at least one Friend caught up in some interpersonal spat, so he talked things out with the go-to conciliator and that helped. Maybe we all need to appoint go-to conciliators so that we don’t take things out on our local or yearly business meetings.

    I’m proud of New England Yearly Meeting’s determination to make their business sessions more spiritual in nature. I think that it really helps the meeting.


  6. Thank you, Hae Sung. You speak the mind of many us – young and old. It is only through being faithful in Spirit, however we name it, that the RSOF will fulfill its mission and survive – nurturing today’s prophetic saints and activists. Wisdom for the RSOF comes in all colors, gender identities, sexes, ages – it is faithfulness that counts, not the “packaging” with “credentials. So be bold and continue in your faithfulness and leadership. So glad we shared Home Group in Pisac and looking forward to accompanying you in the journey as you inspire me in mine.


  7. Vince says:

    Hi, I’m a former Pentecostal now Quaker (non-liberal I would say). Have you ever read a book called “Brethren Hang Loose” (Robert Girard) or New Wineskins (Howard Snyder)? Theyou are more mainstream Christianity but talk of a more ‘organic’ style church that may encourage you? I’mean going to re-read due to coming to Quakerism and feeling isolated with my charismatic beliefs in a sea of athiest’s, humanists and nominals.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s